wearepaladin:

weareoracle:

astriiformes:

sol1loqu1st:

astriiformes:

greed-the-dorkalicious:

astriiformes:

greed-the-dorkalicious:

astriiformes:

WHAT

Hi, Wizards of the Coast? I’d like to pitch my new wizard subclass, Vore Mage,

hey alex do accept constructive criticism on your reblogs

Yeah, why? Do you not like the name? I’m a little iffy on it myself, how about “Vorelock” instead?

CEASE THIS

vorecerer,

C E A S E

@wearepaladin, how would you feel about me switching classes to voreacle?

Here lies paladin, done in at last. His eyes proved the epicenter of the flash of holy light that destroyed his body in order to save the soul.

oulfis:

pangodillo:

lawfulgoodness:

roguestorm:

concept: an austen-inspired tabletop rpg where there are five classes

  1. single man in possession of a large fortune who is in want of a wife
  2. young woman with low connections who must marry so that she can secure her future
  3. cad whose main goal is to convince someone to elope with him
  4. wealthy, scheming woman whose goal is to ruin the happiness of the aforementioned young woman
  5. tiresome & vulgar elderly busybody (can be either a man or a woman)

I’m gonna split this out a little farther, because I feel like we’re blurring the lines between classes and stats. First you should pick your Austen class:

  • Bachelor/Bachelorette
  • Cad / Floozy
  • Husband/Wife
  • Matriarch/Patriarch
  • Busybody

Then you roll for your stats across the 6 basic Abilities:

  • Money
  • Intelligence
  • Connections
  • Manners
  • Looks
  • Snark

@oulfis

I would absolutely play this. I would DM this. I would write, and then read, carefully snide free indirect discourse passages of scene-setting as a DM for this.